Which of the following is a result of community suspension from the NFIP concerning funding?

A community suspension from the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) has specific consequences regarding funding and development. When a community is suspended, it is essentially removed from participating in the NFIP, which directly affects its access to various types of federal funding.

The correct understanding here is that no federal loans for development are available during the suspension period. Communities rely on these federal loans for various projects, including those aimed at improving infrastructure resilience and managing flood risks. Without access to these loans, development projects become significantly constrained, as local entities lose a key funding source.

Federal grants for flood mitigation, emergency funding, and floodplain mapping activities are affected in different ways during a suspension. Emergency funding may still be accessible under certain conditions, but it typically does not encompass the full array of resources that would otherwise be available. Furthermore, floodplain mapping may be administratively impacted, as mapping efforts often require collaboration with participating communities in the NFIP. Thus, the implication is that while there might be some temporary or restricted funding available, the broader and more significant sources become unavailable as a direct consequence of suspension from NFIP.